20 Jun
2004
20 Jun
'04
5:55 a.m.
On 20-Jun-2004 Lee Revell wrote:
} On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 22:55, RickTaylor(a)speakeasy.net wrote:
} > it. Why would I use anything else? Because someone else tells me I should?
}
} I never meant to say anyone should use anything other than what gives
} them the best sound. I should have been more specific, my point was
} that I think 96khz is overkill for recording sounds from outside the
} computer. Of course you should upsample and process at a higher
} resolution if possible, no matter what format your input is, just
} because it gives you more room for error.
Why wouldn't you simply record at a higher rate and downsample? There's only
one resample {Other than the processing or whatever.} and you start with
a better quality sample that way.
----------------------------------
E-Mail: RickTaylor(a)Speakeasy.Net
Date: 20-Jun-2004
Time: 02:40:45
This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------