10 Feb
2013
10 Feb
'13
10:08 p.m.
I think that's a fairly silly comparison. Your example is essentially
neutral: a wallpaper without sexual imagery doesn't cater in
particular to any group, at least not on gender/sexuality grounds. An
image with sexual imagery manifestly does cater more to one group than
others (albeit, in this case, probably only very slightly).
J
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"I think that including an image of a
'hot' female tacitly sends the
message that those who are viewing it are likely to be (heterosexual)
males, i.e., that this is a 'boy's space'."
Using that same logic, NOT including an image that is considered "hot"
by one sex or the other must then mean that we are tacitly send the
message that those who are viewing are likely to be asexual, that this is
"asexual space". And some asexual people might get offended.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user