14 Jun
2011
14 Jun
'11
8:46 a.m.
To me that suggests that either you have a completely
unique
problem to solve or that they are other solutions to your
problem that other people use to get around the same problem.
My guess is that your problem is not completely unique.
Certainly not unique. My guess is that nobody worried about a
(possibly small) performance penalty, and instead used simpler
strategies. Or they gave up libsndfile, or they never used libsndfile
in the first place (e.g. due to the scaling factors issue).
Modifying libsndfile to do fread/fwrite style
buffering would be
relatively easy. Again, patches accepted.
Given the virtual I/O layer in libsndfile, this is superfluous (and,
furthermore, a userspace cache adds an extra layer of copying, which
in *other* use cases could reduce performance).
Was that a confirmation or a request for confirmation?
Joining a
mailing list usually involves:
I know. Maybe I messed something up -- I don't have copies anymore.
However if that were the case the message I sent two weeks ago should
have bounced back too.
The main problem that I see though is the lack of a mailing list
archive. So let's continue on LAD.
-- Dan