7 Jan
2011
7 Jan
'11
10:03 p.m.
On 01/07/2011 09:44 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/07/2011 09:34 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
It is not released yet and there's no ETA.
On 01/07/2011 09:22 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Ok, I'm interested in your view about that
kernel. On 01/07/2011 09:15 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
No, although
there's some minor effort for Maverick.
Previously we did -rt kernel packages for i386, i686 and amd64.
Currently we're focusing on amd64 and squeeze only. That may change
again in the not-too-distant future once 2.6.37-rt is out.
Depending on pengutronix' config for 2.6.37-rt we may also just join
Uwe Kleine-König's endeavour. Hi Jeremy,
On 01/07/2011 08:56 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
> On 01/07/2011 08:14 PM, Josh Lawrence wrote:
>> in addition to Robin's suggestions, I'll add one more to the mix:
>> AVLinux uses this kernel, I dunno if it is a true -rt kernel, but my
>> results have been very positive:
>>
>> http://liquorix.net/
>>
>> ymmv. my initial reaction would be to trust the 64 studio kernel
>> over
>> all of the suggestions, just b/c they are familiar with the linux
>> audio landscape.
> The liquorix kernel is not a RT kernel. And I tried the 64 Studio
> kernel, had to change the apt line though:
>
> deb http://apt.64studio.com/backports squeeze-backports main contrib
> non-free
Is there also a 64studio RT kernel for Lucid? Is it good practice to install a debian kernel for
Lucid?
It should not make a difference. The only thing is you won't get
automatic updates.
2c,
robin
--
Robin Gareus
web: http://gareus.org/ mail: robin(a)gareus.org
lab: http://citu.fr/ chat: xmpp:rgareus@ik.nu
Public Key at http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://gareus.org/public.asc
Fingerprint : 7107 840B 4DC9 C948 076D 6359 7955 24F1 4F95 2B42