10 Dec
2003
10 Dec
'03
3:36 p.m.
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 18:29, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 10:13, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
In Europe, there is half a law already: M$ can't use
copyright to stop
you reverse-engineering something like a file-format-spec to make
something interoperable. Microsoft's control of the .doc and .xls
formats is much more dangerous than their control the desktop.
The gov't should only accept communications, submissions,
representations, in open (published) file formats. A good open
government case can be made for such rules; it would open up .doc very
quickly.
But in the meantime, Crossover Office is essential!
--
Edward Barrow
Copyright Consultant
http://www.copyweb.co.uk/
***Important: see http://www.copyweb.co.uk/email.htm for information on
the legal status of this email***
[ someone ]
Juhana,
We should have a law? That's a big step. It's more likely to end up
looking like DRM than something that opens word processing formats to
the world...
But, really, why should we have a law at all? It's my business to
buy, use and get stuck inside a proprietary format that I cannot get out
of, isn't it? As someone who runs a business, why would I want
to pay someone $600 to
fix 10 documents when I can buy Microsoft's tools for $300 and have
guaranteed compatibility? That's a tough sell...
Hello. We should have a law which says the file formats should be
open formats. People who write and make documents should have a vendor
independent access to the documents.
At meanwhile, why one should be able to read Word and Excel documents
in Linux? One can always ask clients to print to the good old paper
or to an image file.
Regards,
Juhana