18 Mar
2005
18 Mar
'05
11:30 p.m.
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 14:53 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 23:40 -0800, Florin Andrei
wrote:
True.
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 19:43 -0800, Florin Andrei
wrote:
Shock! Horror! I used to think that SoundBlaster are decent cards -
well, now, after getting used to the SB sound and migrating to 1010...
there's a clear difference!
Not suprised, but to be completely fair the SBLive Value does have the
cheapest codecs and worst S/N ratio of all of them. So that's not an
entirely fair comparison. It is a $30 sound card after all. Also did you use the rear channels as your mains?
It's fairly well
documented that the ADC used for the rear channels on sblive cards is
much better quality.
I didn't know that. But, frankly, now i don't care. :-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/