8 Jul
2005
8 Jul
'05
3:23 p.m.
Thanks for the info Robin. There was only one security URL for stable (Woody)
before, which I presume is now allocated to stable (Sarge) now. Are there now
2 different URL's for Sarge and Woody security updates. I have 2 instances of
Debian. One is stable (Sarge), the other is getting upgrades from the testing
repo, going into Etch territory. Which is the correct URL to put into
/etc/apt/sources.list to get security updates for Sarge (stable). Nigel.
On Friday 08 Jul 2005 5:19 pm, robin wrote:
Kevin Sookocheff wrote:
Hello,
Recently there has been news that Debian is lacking in security updates
(http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/05/07/05/217225.shtml?tid=90). I've
been pondering installing DeMudi for a while but want to know what people
think of these security problems. I don't particularly like red-hat so
keep that in mind. Does anyone use Mandrake for pro-audio. It's what
I'm most familiar with but I don't want to have a mountain of
configuration problems to get real-time performance. What about Ubuntu
with the DeMudi packages? Is this relatively easy to setup?
Thanks for any advice,
Kevin
Hi
For info:
Part of Debian email sent out 08/07/05
quote>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Debian Project http://www.debian.org/
Debian Security Support in Place press(a)debian.org
July 8th, 2005 http://www.debian.org/News/2005/20050708
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Support in Place
The Debian project confirms that the security infrastructure for both
the current release Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 (alias sarge) and the former
release 3.0 (alias woody) is working again. The security team is now
able to provide updates on a regular basis again.
end quote>>>
Plus Demudi-1.2.1 released today
Available at http://demudi.agnula.org/wiki/InstallCdRom with .iso and
instructions
FAQ http://demudi.agnula.org/wiki/DocumentsFaq
Packages/version http://demudi.agnula.org/images/1.2.1/README.PACKAGES