18 Jun
2016
18 Jun
'16
4:08 p.m.
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 02:41:24PM +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote:
On 2016-06-17 14:23, cbannister(a)slingshot.co.nz
wrote:
Good point! :(
Hint: It'll be way more than 16 people, I can
think of at least
5 people *I know* who are not on facebook ..
Well, as soon as someone uploads a foto of these 5 people their facial
recognition data is linked in the graph. Every time i give my phone
number to someone who's agreed to let facebook upload its contacts to
the database, i'm a linked to them in the graph. Being "on" facebook
reaches far beyond opening an account. There might be a non-human readable name attached to
my facebook ID, all
that prevents someone from abusing that data (translate my non-human
readable ID to my real name) are moral-barriers.
Then we're all doomed!! :(
Yeah, it's amazing how little data you need to do that.
On 2016-06-16 23:21, worik wrote:
Huh? Isn't it easier to keep track of posts if you reply to
each message separately?
This could turn out to be a real Dog's Breakfast if worik decides to
reply to your message and top posts while doing so.
--
The media's the most powerful entity on earth.
They have the power to make the innocent guilty
and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power.
-- Malcolm X