On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:02:46 -0400, jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:27 -0500
"Chris Caudle" <chris(a)chriscaudle.org> wrote:
Paul applied this patch recently in preparation
for a new jack1
release:
I was under the impression that jackd2 was 'the Jack' as Linux Mint
runs 1.9.9.5 while nevertheless having - for all practical purposes -
an empty jackd package (version 5). Will there be yet another jack
series, of a jack1 type, in the near future ?
On Debian/Ubuntu applications such as Ardour have a dependency to the
the package "jackd" and the package "jackd" requires to install the
package "jackd1" or "jackd2". "jackd1" is older than
"jackd2", so it's
nothing new.
Here is an overview of the differences between jack1 and jack2:
https://github.com/jackaudio/jackaudio.github.com/wiki/Q_difference_jack1_j…
News about latest innovations and development status could be find
by recent posts to
http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org ,
unfortunately reading the archive requires to subscribe.
For jack1 it starts here:
http://lists.jackaudio.org/private.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org/2016-Januar…
For jack2 it starts here:
http://lists.jackaudio.org/private.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org/2016-March/…
It's important to read the follow-ups to avoid misunderstandings,
especially about the future of jack1.
The reason for several jack2 users likely is this one:
http://lists.jackaudio.org/private.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org/2016-Februa…
One reason why I'm using jack2:
http://lists.jackaudio.org/private.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org/2016-Februa…
However, regarding this issue I likely likely could use jack1 too:
http://lists.jackaudio.org/private.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org/2016-Februa…
Regards,
Ralf