1 Nov
2016
1 Nov
'16
12:09 p.m.
Il 31/10/2016 20:17, Louigi Verona ha scritto:
There is simply no time in the world that anyone can
review code for
even one sophisticated
piece of software they are using. So those claims of free software
activists are mostly irrelevant
for the ordinary user and are no more than sound bites.
Hi folks!
If you do not have enough time, or competence like me, to review source
code of the software you use, there are people that do this boring work
for you in order to assure you that the software you use will do exactly
what you expect. This people are the contributors developers, and we
have at least 71 people who control Ardour[1] for you, and 26 who
control Hydrogen[2] for you. And you can talk with them asking for bugs
correction, new features or more stability, if this is what you are
looking for. A very different approach from the proprietary software.
I do not expect that a software that I use for recording music can do
nasty or evil things. But what about an email client, or a browser, or
an operative system?
I complete agree with yPhil, and that's why I applied the free software
reasons to my music, and I share not only my songs, but even my single
recordings tracks and Ardour project with a CC-BY-SA license.
Please, see:
http://johnoption.org/?page_id=9
Ciao,
Max-B
1. https://github.com/Ardour/ardour
2. https://github.com/hydrogen-music/hydrogen
--
IM: massimo(a)jabber.fsfe.org - OpenPGP Key-Id: 0x5D168FC1