22 Sep
2009
22 Sep
'09
11:55 a.m.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Michael Bohle
<opendaw(a)jacklab.org> wrote:
and LV2.
We don't need this shiny bloated closed source VST with all this
uncreative presets.
Not all VSTs have equivalents on Linux, sadly, especially with regard
to virtual instruments.
We have good instruments like Hexter and so on, enough for music production. If it is not
enough for you, start to developing other virtual instruments. But don't look back to
the proprietary shiny VST preset wonderland, we don't need this.
Thats what I've learned in endless discussions with this list and now I believe this
is true.
Michael
Just wondering, could a hardware VST host be another solution for the
'VST-problem' on Linux?
There is no VST problem on Linux - we have Jack, Hydrogen, Zynadd, LADSPA -- Brett
------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden;
If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world."
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
--- original Nachricht Ende ----