3 Jul
2003
3 Jul
'03
1:26 a.m.
Right, and basically except for Kid Rock, the only stuff being signed is
teeny bopper crap, or Celine Dion rip offs, none of that music is even
worth stealing, much less buying. Even a Kid Rock is just uncreative,
neandertalic and totally uncreative. As a creative artist I know I have no
hope of making it here, but I used to think I could work tech jobs and use
the programming experience to help my music, but now that I've been pushed
out of the tech industry I don't know what I'm going to do, but I know I
haven't been able to fit in as an artist, and now I don't even fit in as a
bloody worker, so basically next February (when my unemployment runs
out) I get to find out how I'm going to continue as an electronic composer
while living out on the streets of la.
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, iriXx wrote:
Steve Harris wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:15:23PM +0100, Daniel
James wrote:
bollox. i'd care.... and would be very curious to read it! thats exactly
what my Copyleftmedia campaign is all about....
best,
m~
--
|\ _,,,---,,_
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ HTTP 503: Too Busy
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL
.::. www.iriXx.org .::. www.copyleftmedia.org.uk .::.
Musicians say No to RIAA Persecution and Prosecution of Music Lovers!
Sign the petition at http://www.copyleftmedia.org.uk/justsayno/
If you're talking about musicians getting paid
properly - a decent,
sustainable income that's proportional to their effort and talent -
then I couldn't agree more. However, the music business doesn't have
a great history on that front...
I wrote a rambling reply about very cheap (and Free) tools alowing the
bedroom studio to be a useful thing, lessening the grip of big labels on
musicians then realised it was obvious / noone cares ;)