10 Jun
2010
10 Jun
'10
11:53 a.m.
On 2010-06-10 11:38, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Atte André Jensen wrote:
It is.
I just realized that I also have done some software patches (diff files)
to some software, mostly a couple of patches to the chuck sourcecode.
How about that? It seems that chuck is under LGPL, if it matters...
1) Can I Just Do It, simply by stating on the
webpage and/or in the
software that it's under GPLv3.
If its your code, then yes. Fors software licenses, this:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
is really good.
Thanks!
CC Attribution (or maybe CC Share Alike) is probably
best for synth patches.
Thanks! Again is it simply a matter of stating on the web page that the
licence is CC Attribution?
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk