13 Mar
2013
13 Mar
'13
1:03 p.m.
Am 13.03.2013 02:44, schrieb Brett McCoy:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
Indeed it may be faster/snappier if it would not integrate all the
KDE-Stuff but: the time, when KDEnlive really hang because of being
bloatish where over 1.5-2 years ago and it did not crash on me in the
last months either.
Anyway: KDE ist still much leaner/faster than MSWindows and still leaner
than OSX and these are the big beacons of professionality everybody is
longing for is it not ;-)
Having 8Gig of RAM when you plan to edit AV and a decent entry-level
graphics card and audio-interface should be not too rude a requirement
nowadays methinks...
And I had KDEnlive cutting 2h-videos with hundreds of cuts/transitions,
titles etc on a T60 Thinkpad with but 2 Gigs of RAM.
In the end I think, if KDEnlive would drop all te "KDE-bloat" and
optimize by using basic QT-stuff only, the effect would be hardly
recognizable for the user.
Cinelerra can't compare with it, LightWorks
is professional software,
but it does need professional gear, so Cinelerra or even kmenc15 still
might be better solution for most of us.
I've found Cinelerra to be very buggy and unstable (crashed a lot). I
used it on a couple of projects but it was not to my taste, I guess.
The workflow and interface was kind of clumsy, too.
kdenlive is much more usable but seems to suffer from KDE bloat and is
laggy, especially for playback. But it's quite similar in workflow to
Sony Vegas.