Re: [LAU] An appeal to famous artists?

My 2 cents: I use software that does the job. OpenSource is not necessarly free, just means one can get the sources and compile it, twiddle the code, if one so chooses. Not all musicians can or want to bother with this. One thing is that opensource authors are much more accessible and listen to suggestions. This has made nted into quite an effective scoring package. Put down top bucks for Sibelius, great program but you buy the package, that's it. Two big windows DAWs, Sonar and Cubase are costly but get the job done quite nicely. Why would one want more? Same goes for Protools on the Mac (I found the windows port awful). A few "smaller" choices are around and serve well folks that prefer them. I used Sonar's little sister, Home Studio, more bang for the buck, until the upgrade demanded newer windows. Then my windows 98! died, ending that. Did nice work with this program and if it would run on wine, I would continue with it, even the old version. Good old Cakewalk "Express" runs on wine but is restricted to two audio tracks. Could even live with that, keeping the MIDI as MIDI, but ... I still use Jammer which runs nearly 100% on wine and Style Enhancer which is OK on wine as well. XGedit for the XG sound generator (no ALSA driver, but can be used as an MPU401) also 100%. I have not chosen a DAW yet for Linux. OOMidi2 looks a lot like Home Studio, same drawn automation model. Qtractor looks quite good as well. Rosegarden is a mature, well developed software. Ardour3 with MIDI will be a solid contender and there is a luscious paid version around (Ardour 2 based right now) which I might consider buying. Count them, and I have not even mentioned all of them. Linux and Opensource are about choice. I would still put down bucks on a top-flight software based on opensource (or even something excelent though proprietory). The one fly in the ointment of all this choice as lack of interoperability that would let me use several of these programs as desired, but one cannot do this on high-ticket proprietary windows or mac stuff either. Most all the DAWs support/need plugins and many the wealth of free and paid VSTs can be used in the programs in addition to the Linux native formats. I need registration codes for the "new" computer/OS for some of these but I have worked miracles with them, so ... There is nothing wrong with using, continuing to use windows or macs for audio. Keep paying for upgrades when the upgrades (even free) for the software require the newer windows or OSX. Maybe worth the cost. Most of the gear costs much more. But I would love to finally get a full project off on the Linux/opensource packages even if I start out with wined windows tools for MIDI (these tools do what I want--they are getting quite old, and I have suggested that their authors release them to opensource some time along the road. I beta'ed and worked with these folks so maybe have some influence). Now with all the alternatives simply, choose, start singing and mixing.