18 Feb
2004
18 Feb
'04
2:20 p.m.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:13:17 +0000
Steve Harris <S.W.Harris(a)ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 06:52:26AM -0800,
davidrclark(a)earthlink.net wrote:
I do know how much it throws my synch off when I do have to resample stuff. I
just imagine what it does to any audio signal. {which was the point of the
44/48 resampling issue in the first place} There are other cards that sound much
better for just a bit more money. Why settle?
--
See these tears so blue. An ageless heart that can never mend.
Tears can never dry. A judgement made can never bend.
...
And I've been putting out fire with gasoline...
{Dave}
As a footnote, Steve Harris mentioned that the
Live! cards resample, even
at 48 Ksamples/sec. Well, the signal path may include resampling, but
technically, the interpolation algorithms used should reproduce the input
exactly. So in fact, there should be no difference. In other words, don't
It doesnt appear to - a friend of mine has been poking his to try and
figure out whats going on. If you send a 48k impulse through it comes back
with clear resampling symptoms.
The effect is not particularly audible, but its not preserving the bits. I
can definatly believe that the 44.1 -> 48 is more audible.