13 Jul
2005
13 Jul
'05
1:10 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 06:42:29PM +0200, Christoph Eckert wrote:
Christoph, is there any reason you wouldn't use both preemption and
rt-lsm at the same time?
--
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki | Systems Administrator
Technical Operations Division | Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW | Washington, DC 20036 | 202-530-4900
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
network(a)rfa.org.
I've just
joined the list and it's pretty interesting.
Can someone tell me something about the differences between
the preempt patch from Ingo and the "Realtime Linux
Security Module"? I currently use the latter one and I'm
quite satisfied as jack works really fast. Perhaps one
should try this way instead of the vanilla kernel patch.
There have to be pros and cons I'm interested in. Can
someone point them out?
same for me, but RT-LSM has been dropped by Andrew Morton
in
the 2.6.12-mm kernels, so we should start using preemt.
Unfortunately, even for me RT-LSM gives much better results
than preemption. And even with the RT-LSM I get "only"
16msecs latencies.