29 Jan
2003
29 Jan
'03
7:35 p.m.
For me, I used to use Suse until I came across CCRMA, they just have their
system so well put together, their server uptime and package reliability
is just great.
http://www.brianredfern.org
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Mark Knecht wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-audio-user-admin(a)music.columbia.edu
[mailto:linux-audio-user-admin@music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Brian
Redfern
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:51 PM
To: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: [linux-audio-user] MDK audio distro survey
Hey, I'm totally grateful to Fernando, he's saved me many, many hours of
configuration and kernel recompiling, Planet CCRMA works great with Redhat
8.0, and using synaptic and the apt-get port its super easily!
http://www.brianredfern.org
And I haven't heard Austin say anything bad about Fernando or the Planet. I
think Austin likes Mandrake a lot, and he's asked a very general question of
people that may not be qualified to answer"
"Why isn't Mandrake your distribution of choice?"
For me, I've heard great things about Mandrake, but I've never built a
machine using Mandrake. Except for recent, I think, things I've read about
Mandrake going under financially, I've really considered trying it out.
However, I can't figure out right now how it's better or worse, and I'm not
qualified to say much more.
If the Mandrake version of RPM is capable of figuring out dependencies and
then automatically getting me all the stuff I need, then that's a step up
from standard Redhat, and close to what Fernando provides. It might be
enough to cause me to look, if it's true, but I don't know much more today.
Very happy to have Austin here talking about Mandrake because I am truly
interested.
Cheers,
Mark