28 Feb
2007
28 Feb
'07
7:38 a.m.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 11:34:52AM +0100, Atte André Jensen wrote:
Loki Davison wrote:
Hmm. Back when I tried AMS, I had huge problems to get MIDI input working,
wheras with Om, it just worked. Later on the change to midi input nodes
and 2 converter plugins (trigger and node) caused a short Huh? but makes
sense.
Ever considered creating patches for a multitrack MIDI composition
in AMS?
I do it all the time with Om and it works well:
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22Thorsten%20Wilms%22%20…
Subpatches rule.
Still, I can't recommend Om, with it being unmaintained, with a choice
between a horrible outdated version and an unofficial one with some
strange bugs.
Ingen is not ready for use. Last I heared is that you might be able to
chain up plugins, bu no saving/loading.
--
Thorsten Wilms
I find AMS really, really horrible for modular
stuff
Interresting.
I find ams much more intuitive and faster to work with than om (didn't
try ingen, is that ready to use?). It's hard for me to pinpoint exactly
what does the difference, but I find I can slam a really nice patch
together in ams in a matter of minutes.