5 Sep
2008
5 Sep
'08
7 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:50:12PM +0300, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)kokkinizita.net> writes:
Probably 0.5 then.
Dbus is not the solution, it's not networked. The first app
I'd like to use LASH for uses four networked computers, three
of them headless, which is why I want a session manager.
Guess I'll have to brew my own then.
Ciao,
--
FA
Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
I'll embrace LASH as soon as its authors bump
up the
version number and convert it to OSC, and allow app
developers to use this directly instead of passing
through a library that doesn't fit in at all with the
architecture of my apps. It's actually *very close*
to being OSC, the effort required would be minimal.
(posted almost the same a year ago)
Do you talk about lash 0.5.x or about the new development, 0.6.x that
uses dbus instead of custom protocol (and is not released yet)?