19 Oct
2016
19 Oct
'16
11:04 p.m.
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:52:36 +0100
Chris Cannam <cannam(a)all-day-breakfast.com> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, at 21:43, Jeremy Carter wrote:
Not a recording engineer myself (and never will be) but I do know a couple.
When I tried to describe this as best I could to one today he jumped in with
"Automation. Great. Provided I'm the one who set it up and know exactly what is
happening at all times".
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
What does the AI community think of it though?
Dunno about AI exactly, but the auto-mixing area is quite a popular
topic in academia. The AES workshop on intelligent music production
(http://www.aes-uk.org/forthcoming-meetings/wimp2/ - hosted by the group
I work in) covered some of this ground, to interesting but inconclusive
ends.
The SAFE plugins (http://www.semanticaudio.co.uk/) are related as well:
based on crowdsourced mappings between musical terminology and plugin
parameters, rather than on inputs from surrounding tracks, but the
mechanism is vaguely similar.
I'm working on a project about shared feature requisition from tracks at
the moment, though I don't know whether it would be directly applicable
to this sort of use.
Chris