21 Apr
2004
21 Apr
'04
5:05 p.m.
i understand the frustration behind the vendetta, as i too had tons of
trouble getting the quattro to work on 2.4.x and was pretty irked when
it looked like 2.6.x wasnt going to support it period, but i just dont
see the need to call it a "total piece of junk" everytime the quattro
comes up on a list, especially now that that it seems that the troubles
with the quattro are historical. and yeah, i have much respect for
frank, i'm not trolling him, i just dont want people to get a mistaken
impression of the quattro as i'm quite happy with it.
Matthew Allen wrote:
I never saw it as a vendetta, just more of a "this
thing stole months of
my life away, please don't let it steal months from yours"
:)
m.
--
________________________________________________________________
live experimental electronic music -- http://bluevitriol.com
independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-
user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Josh Steiner
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Quattro USB
i really just need to point out that frank seems to have a personal
vendetta against the quattro. it does violate the USB spec in a minor
_________________________________________________
Scanned on 21 Apr 2004 17:50:42
Scanning by http://erado.com