Re: [LAU] maximum input level, or normalization and dc offset correction?

I guess it was off-list by accident?! -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> To: Rusty Perez <rustys.lists(a)gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LAU] maximum input level, or normalization and dc offset correction? Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 20:40:23 +0200 On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 11:20 -0700, Rusty Perez wrote: A valid question, but don't care about the dynamic, the real issue with mastering music that should sound as good as possible on as much equipment as possible is the whole mix regarding to frequencies, phases vs mono and stereo. It's unlikely that noise will become an issue, it's more likely that the frequencies are biased or that there will be phasing between the channels. What faders do you use? The analog inputs have an optimized working point, perhaps the digital side then is too high or lower than "optimal". I don't know what positive or negative effects are caused by digital remachining. Keep the level below 0 dBFS, resp. add headroom. Too high in all cases is bad, but even a real too low level might be inaudible. "I never normalize the tracks in the DAW when mixing. I can't do it with my analog machine, so I don't do it with my DAW." - Ricardus Vincente and we can use the volume control of our amps to make the music louder and quieter. However, optimal leveling at recording time is better, than postprocessing. Analogy: If a recording does miss frequencies, you can't raise the missing frequencies, you only can rase frequencies that are there, but to silent, but this will come with side effects.