8 Dec
2003
8 Dec
'03
1:25 p.m.
Yeah, and (God I hate to say this) Micro$oft Excel is actually a damn good product. On
it's own merits it beats the pants off just about anything else out there.
Jan
-----Original Message-----
From: "linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu"
<linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu> on behalf of "Mark Knecht"
<markknecht(a)comcast.net>
Sent: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 09:04:46 -0800
To: "John Bleichert" <syborg(a)earthlink.net>et>, "A list for linux audio
users" <linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu>
Subject: RE: Is the Linux desktop really here ? was: Re:[linux-audio-user]ebayguy: looks
like he figured it out
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 07:01, John Bleichert wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 eviltwin69(a)cableone.net wrote:
In my experience this isn't the way the world works. She's probably
receiving Excel spreadsheets from others that already have stuff
embedded that won't work with Linux tools. I ran into this problem big
time when we looked at Star Office and Open Office for work. We couldn't
use either as their compatibility with both Word and Excel wasn't good
enough and broke our compatibility with both our vendors and our
customers.
As someone who runs a business, why would I want to pay someone $600 to
fix 10 documents when I can buy Microsoft's tools for $300 and have
guaranteed compatibility? That's a tough sell...
My wife is the comptroller for a US Navy activity. She is the ultimate hard-core Excel
user ;-) Neither Open Office nor Gnumeric can handle the macros that she uses.
Jan
Yeah, I bet. That's a difficult switch. Although, to be fair, OO Calc or
Gnumeric would work fine if she chose to re-program all those macros in
their native macro languages ;-) (Does gnumeric have one? I haven't used
it in years)