12 Dec
2009
12 Dec
'09
1:51 p.m.
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:24:22 -0500
Dave Phillips <dlphillips(a)woh.rr.com> wrote:
Scott Ecker wrote:
Having said that a cathedral organist has to cope with horrendous
'latency'. Partly due to the organ mechanics, but also due to the
variable 'response time' of the choir!
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
david wrote:
Indeed. I think the ll issue is of real importance when recording. At 64
ms multitrack recording/playback is a not very satisfying experience.
Best,
dp ...
I see people on the list running much lower latencies than 64msec, and
seemingly trying to get even lower ...
You can't punch-in at 64ms and expect it to sound good. At 4ms it's
seamless, literally.