On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Arnold Krille
<arnold(a)arnoldarts.de> wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2008 schrieb Ken
Restivo:
Good call on Ardour; I probably would have had
the easiest time working
with this file in Ardour. Ardour is sweet. But for just editing one long
audio file, it seemed a bit like overkill. Also, I'd be too tempted to
overdub onto it, which is a no-no for a live recording :-)
There are actually very good reasons to use ardour for post-processing
of
live-recordings:
- Its completely non-destructive, even if you slice your 2-hour-file
into 10-seconds snippets and rearrange them and delete them one-by-one,
you still don't loose the material. Yes, you should have backups, but who
knows... - Its _very_ easy to apply mastering effects over the whole
session. (And with the jamin-control-plugin you can change settings
between songs.) - And all editing on effects and automation is
non-destructive too. That is very nice compared to clicking "apply effect
(silence)", having the computer work for ten minutes and the realize that
a) its the wrong effect and b) the "create undo" wasn't selected.
- ardour is definitely not trying to load the whole 2-hour file into
ram...
Don't forget the CD markers -> TOC export for creating CDs easily
with
Ardour. Works great for live CDs where you want to add track
boundaries with no gaps for disk-at-once burning.