27 Dec
2002
27 Dec
'02
8:17 p.m.
Sound fonts really serve a different purpose than loops. Sound fonts are
not necessarily cut to be looped at all.
On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 06:56, Darren Landrum wrote:
Can Soundfonts handle samples at any bit widths and
sample rates other
than 16/48?
Then again, the vast majority of hardware synths are still just 16/48,
although I believe Roland is making a series of keyboards that have
24/96 sample sets within them.
Also, I believe that Soundfonts were designed specifically with the
SoundBlaster cards in mind, so is there a proprietary issue with using
these for our library?
Thank you for the reply, Mr. Redfern.
Regards,
Darren Landrum
On Thursday, December 26, 2002, at 10:13 PM, Brian Redfern wrote:
You'd want to use soundfonts
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 08:42, Darren Landrum
wrote:
> Okay, based upon some thinking, I am now ready to tackle a design of
> this system. There are some other things I would like to run by
> everyone, though.
>
> In the course of all of these conversations, loops were discussed most
> prominently, at the expense of what to do about patches and sample
> sets, which are the areas I personally would be more interested in. (I
> have used Acid, but only casually. So I understand most of how it's
> supposed to work.)