-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Arnold Krille schrieb:
On Friday 06 November 2009 10:28:26 Florian Faber
wrote:
Just in case
you haven't noticed: Firewire is dead. The number of
devices with a firewire port is decreasing rapidly.
I wouldn't advocate Firewire devices anymore for new buyers.
But there are no alternatives. USB1 is to slow, USB2 has no (widely accepted)
standard. USB3 has no devices yet, don't know whether it defines a standard.
And even if you only need the 2 channels USB1 can provide easily you
wont find any USB1-Device on the shelf. The vendors build everything in
USB2 - just because it is there and they don not want to discuss
consumer-questions like "What?! USB1 only - and I shall pay more then 20
for such an antique piece of equipment?".
Firewire is the only thing where you can have high
number of channels and even
more then one device on one connection. And work for supporting almost all
devices except for Motu is quite advanced thanks to support from the vendors.
So these big beasts seem to be the only alternative...
I can only hope, that the distributors wake up and put some of their
big-company-weight (and errrmm maybe some of their money?) into that.
But they seem to be totally unaware of something like a need for
pro-audio-support for Linux. - What a misconception! Every OS out there
that qualifies as "full grown" offers support for everything any user
today does on a PC. MS and Apple do not ignore audio-needs just because
audio-producers are only a small percentage of the userbase.
The SuseAG showed some insight on this as they put the alsa-people on
their payroll and set up a certified-for-linux programme for
multimedia-devices that made Linux visible to companies like Terratec.
As a result we now have perfect support for envy24-cards.
But NOVELL cut these efforts. And other distributors, that proudly claim
"We love the desktop-user!"? They do not much more than to gracefully
accept a halfhearted integration of the unpaid efforts of free devs in
the backyards of their repos...
I really wonder what can be done to change this...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkr1VKwACgkQ1Aecwva1SWN4AgCbBjqFnrgUzart53yY2N1o9ByP
XNgAnjBftVhadRj/AGt2Njt17UZxFfJS
=BsjF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----