2 Nov
2005
2 Nov
'05
2:35 p.m.
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 18:46:03 +0100
conrad berhörster <conrad.berhoerster(a)gmx.de> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. November 2005 18:38 schrieb Florian Schmidt:
yep, instead of rt_limits (they both achieve the same goal with vastly
different approaches).
http://sourceforge.net/projects/realtime-lsm/
--
Palimm Palimm!
http://tapas.affenbande.org
Just for completeness sake: You can use the realtime lsm for 2.6.13 and
above, too. I would even recommend it, since it's much less of a hassle
to setup (rt_limits being the "correct" solution or not).
Flo
Just to be sure . Do you mean lsm instead of rt_limits or both.
and do you have a link for the lsm patch.
sizu c~