5 Apr
2013
5 Apr
'13
7:04 p.m.
While I agree with the gist of your post, I think it is important that
while perceptual encoding as it was developed wasn't input specific,
thinking that MP3 encoding wasn't specifically tweaked to improve
performance on certain music since the basic concept of perceptual encoding
were invented, I think is where I would disagree. However given that I
have no proof at this point I will have to leave it at that.
Seablade
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com>wrote;wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Thomas Vecchione <seablaede(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
things like MP3s were developed aiming at,
mainstream pop music, and
right in the right timeframe as well for mp3.
this isn't really true. MP3 comes out of generic psycho-acoustic research
and isn't based on the input material at all - it is based on the
physiology and psychology of human hearing.
This is why my live recording of acoustic pop
makes it so obvious on the
v6 setting, as it has these components, not a large amount, but some.
no, that isn't why. there are reasons, but its not because of what "MP3
aimed at".