9 Feb
2011
9 Feb
'11
11:16 p.m.
Excerpts from Bearcat M. Sandor's message of 2011-02-09 20:49:07 +0100:
On 2/9/2011 3:05 AM, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
It's hard to say because it's hard to compare those two programs. SND is
a completely scriptable graphical audio editor. Ecasound is a DAW
with a commandline interface and bindings for many programming
languages. I'm sure both can be used for pretty similar things but their
goals are different and they both have a rather steep learning curve.
SND seems to be extremely powerful and flexible
but its learning curve
is insane. I just found out that it has a built-in extensive,
half-working, possibly useful help system.
There's SND-ls that aims to make SND usable by mere mortals, but I'm not
sure it achieved this goal yet:
http://archive.notam02.no/arkiv/src/snd-ls/
I've understood (though not used)
ecasound to have a lower learning
curve and be just as able as snd. Is that correct?
Bearcat M. Sandor