Greetings Favio, Dave, and all,
Nick Collins and Alan Blackwell recently published a paper "The
Programming Language as a Musical Instrument", which put forth a
comparison/contrast of Ableton Live to ChucK (the latter a text-based
audio programming language that, among other things, can be programmed
"on-the-fly", or live). A well-written and fun read, and perhaps
relevant to the subject at hand.
The paper:
http://www.cus.cam.ac.uk/~nc272/papers/pdfs/proglangasmusicinstr.pdf
The chuck:
http://chuck.cs.princeton.edu/
I've also included Nick's original post to TOPLAP below.
Best,
Ge!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:14:15 +0100
From: Nick Collins <nc272(a)cam.ac.uk>
Reply-To: livecode(a)slab.org
To: livecode(a)slab.org
Subject: [livecode] ChucK vs Ableton Live
hi all,
Alan Blackwell and I wrote a paper on 'The Programming Language as a
Musical Instrument' from the perspective of human computer interaction,
which I've made public here in case anyone is curious:
http://www.cus.cam.ac.uk/~nc272/papers/pdfs/proglangasmusicinstr.pdf
It's for the Psychology of Programming Interest Group conference at the
end of this month where Alan is presenting it and will hopefully show
Ade's TOPLAP video on our behalf.
btw, I contributed the central parts waffling about laptop music, live
coding history, and the ChucK (pre Audicle) vs Ableton Live analysis, plus
a bit at the end about maintenance. All the rest is Alan's hard work. It's
written for HCI people so might be a bit entry level on music issues for
some points.
best,
N