9 Jan
2018
9 Jan
'18
12:31 a.m.
On 01/08/2018 11:39 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:45:37 -0500, Peter Lutek wrote:
Yup. That's why I don't use pure Arch, it takes a lot more time at
setup than I care to devote. Manjaro has been doing me a lot of good
for quite some time now. Before that I used Archbang. Manjaro includes
lots of GUI config tools. Not up to Ubuntu's GUIzation, but a lot more
than pure Arch.
--
/Jonathan E. Brickmanjeb(a)ponderworthy.com
<http://login.jsp/?at=02e47df3-a9af-4cd9-b951-1a06d255b48f&mailto=jeb@ponderworthy.com> (785)233-9977/
/Hear us at http://ponderworthy.com -- CDs and MP3s now available!
<http://ponderworthy.com/ad-astra/ad-astra.html>/
/Music of compassion; fire, and life!!!/
are there any particular caveats or helpful
configuration tools to be
aware of in that distribution?
Hi,
I can't speak for Arch derivatives, but I'm a long time Arch user.
There are neither caveats nor helpful configuration tools, there is
just one thing you need to know about Arch Linux, it's aimed for Linux
experienced power users. To me it's the most user-friendly distro, but
it isn't user-friendly in an Ubuntu kind of user-friendliness. A
default install is more basic, than an install from the Ubuntu server
image, with all uncheckable packages unchecked.