30 Apr
2004
30 Apr
'04
6:36 p.m.
It's a brick-wall, lookahead limiter. Crank the input volume and watch
the output meter. The farther you look ahead the gentler the slope to
the absolute limit but it's still a brick wall.
Jan
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 15:12, R Parker wrote:
--- derek holzer <derek(a)x-i.net> wrote:
Ron,
R Parker wrote:
I can't swear by this but I think it's a lookahead.
Steve or one of the other guys will need to tell us.
Do you, or anyone else, have an informed opinion for
whether lookahead or hard is the most appropriate and
why? In all honesty, I don't know. JAMin is headed for
a 1.0 release and I think it would be interesting to
debate whether we're using the best limiter for the
job. Steve and I have briefly touched on this topic a
couple times. It could be that we're using the
appropriate limiter.
ron
Derek, I think you can ignore that error. Does
JAMin
start and do you have a working limiter?
Of course, yes it starts, but I wondered what
limiter it chooses then? A
hard limiter, or the other lookahead limiter? Checking the flattened
peaks of some of my Jamin-processed files, I might
almost think it is a
hard, brickwall limiter.
d.
--
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
---Oblique Strategy # 115:
"Make a sudden, destructive unpredictable action;
incorporate"
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover