27 Jul
2005
27 Jul
'05
7:41 p.m.
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:37:07 +0200, Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote:
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 09:37, James Stone wrote:
although it has not been made with a native linux program? well, i'm only
starting! :)
yes, it has been made with buzz under wine. however i dont doubt that this
could be done with native programs as well. its just that i'm used to this
program a lot, but i'm trying to get away from it.
I hadn't really realised that Buzz worked so well under Wine.. Just
tested it this evening. I like the jack output options.. And no, I wasn't
trying to belittle your music for not being Linux native!!
I think there is nothing quite like Buzz in Linux.. Beast/BSE is trying to
be like it (I think), but has a horribly unintuitive interface at
present.. Also I can't manage to get instruments to play without using up
all the voices (my lack of skill I think!).. There is another project
called Buzztard (a stupid name IMHO), which is more of a direct copy of
Buzz (aiming to go further though), but that is still in alpha, and CVS
only. Most of my music under Linux has been either tracked (soundtracker)
or sequenced with Muse..
James (Stone)
this is
my sunday track:
http://unreleased.paniq.org/paniq-sunday_bam.ogg
I know James Shuttleworth has already said this, but could you say a bit
about how this track was made?
From your site, I suspect Buzz under wine. Is this correct? Its a lovely
track anyway.