16 Jul
2010
16 Jul
'10
12:25 a.m.
On Thursday 15 July 2010 14:50:20 you wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:40 PM, drew Roberts
<zotz(a)100jamz.com> wrote:
That's the problem right there. You can't even prove damages and yet you
think "extreme force" will be necessary to get people to comply. It is time
to give it up and find a new revenue model. Either that or buy into the fact
that the means of production and distribution are now cheap enough and the
skills spread out enough among the population that the world's music needs
can be met by amateurs.
Seriously, shall we have the death penalty for distributors? What about for
performers? What about for unintentional performers?
If not the death penalty, what about 4 or 5 years in jail?
(In case yo think these last questions are in jest, they are not, I would
appreciate a serious answer.)
all the best,
drew
Either you share freely and people contribute to
you willingly as a
result. This will let people be Free. Or you use force on them to *make*
them contribute to you against their will. Personally or via the state.
People no longer have their Freedom in this case.
surely its not that dichotomous. one middle ground:
* don't force support against anyone's will
* use extreme force against anyone who redistributes (i.e. the creator
is the only legal distributor)