9 Feb
2011
9 Feb
'11
8:17 p.m.
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 16:43:28 Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Arnold Krille's message of
2011-02-09 13:21:45 +0100:
Editing is required in either way. Normally my recordings are not concerts
where one songs follows the next (this I record in one single take but also
with timemachine), but services and the like where its 3min music followed by
5min talking followed by 6min music followed by 30min talking and so on. And
when I am only interested in the music, I only record the music.
Last time I used it and actually did a stop-restart within the timemachine-
ringuffer, it seemed to just have a smaller pre-roll, basically the stuff since
the last stop. But my memory is failing there...
Have fun,
Arnold
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 11:50:16 Philipp
Überbacher wrote:
Does this really help? You could just let your recording roll all the
way. The way the timemachine feature works right now you'll likely have
weird issues when you record song after song since the current
implementation doesn't seem to clear the ringbuffer or whatever it uses.
Try recording a couple of seconds, stop recording and start the next
recording within the pre-recording buffer length (10 sec. default) to
see what I mean. It can be a bit confusing and requires editing, or
worse. For recording I'm also a fan of timemachine
because of its simplicity.
You push the big button or press space and it records. You want another
take, press space twice. A simple peak meter is built in, the 'record
the past' feature is nice but I don't really need it.
Recording the past is nice when you are the foh-tech and can only start
the recording once the song is on its way. Setting a buffer of like
60secs gives you enough time to start up and check the live-sound and
only after that "start" the recording. :-)