9 Jan
2014
9 Jan
'14
12:31 p.m.
[Robin Gareus]
On 01/08/2014 05:54 PM, James Stone wrote:
I was under the impression that in an optimal setup (jackd -d alsa -d
hw:$X), the jack buffer/period setup is identical to what the driver
uses to communicate with the hardware.
In fact, examining the ALSA driver parameters[*] while jackd is
running confirms this for both the UCG-102 USB and the ice1712-based
PCI interface here.
Tim
[*] /proc/asound/card$X/pcm0[cp]/sub0/[hs]w_params
Also, how meaningful is the reported jackd buffer
size in terms of
actual latency?
jack buffer size is only meaningful within jack.