* So the
problem was seq24 on the slave machine was running at this own
tempo. If the master use 120BPM and the Slave 110, they are not
synchronized. But if you put 120 on both, it seems to be synchronized...
Well I think there is a bug in seq24 or something. I didn't try with other
softwares. But I have some doubt about the real tempo synchronization.
as stated, it only synchronizes the framecount.
netjack2 seems to do complete tempo synchronisation, but i dont know
if its latency compensated. and i also had somebody reporting,
that it just fails with an assert triggered.
are you running on 64bit?
Still no tempo sync, but the new release of seq24 fixes this:
[...]
Fixed Bugs
* Fixed BPM saving on 64 bit platforms."
[...]
Have a look at this post: