8 Mar
2006
8 Mar
'06
12:21 a.m.
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 22:02, Maluvia wrote:
I assume, (perhaps erroneously), the following things:
1. Everyone, unless they are independently wealthy, living on a
pension, or a hobo, has a job or self-employment income by means of
which they are enabled to pay their bills and purchase the goods and
services they either require or simply desire.
2. All said individuals are actually being *paid* a wage, salary, or
receiving some form of income for this work - else they could not pay
the rent with it, so to speak.
3. All these same individuals believe they *deserve* to be paid for
whatever work they do for their employer - or if self-employed - for
whatever goods or services they offer for sale.
This being the case, how on earth can such individuals make the case
that they deserve to be paid for what they do for a living, while an
artist, programmer, or individual in some line of work other than
their own - does not?
Just asking.
Don't apologize girl, its not required.
I find the degree of hypocrisy underlying such a premise utterly
dumbfounding - not to mention the conceit.
Its a puzzle to me too, and all I can add is a hearty Amen.
- Maluvia
--
Cheers, Gene
People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word
'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's
stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.