22 Dec
2009
22 Dec
'09
3:45 p.m.
Brent Busby wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, sonofzev(a)iinet.net.au wrote:
A friend of mine who is busy trying to push me into using KDE4 says "It
has more eye candy than Windows!" as if that is something wonderful!
I also understand that Qt4 is supposed to be completely cross-platform
now, so KDE will be able to run KDE4 on Windows.
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
TMany that use MusE regularly are more concerned
about jackmidi and
other features that bring new functionality or interoperability. From
my understanding QT4 is more of a cosmetic update and wouldn't
necessarily bring more sequencer functionality in. (correct me if I'm
wrong) However migrating could require a major overhaul....
Robert and Tim have put in a hell of a lot of work in the past year or
so and MusE is functioning really really well. It may look a bit
dated.. but that's really not the point is it?
Actually, I'm kind of dreading KDE/QT 4, because nothing I've seen or
heard of it has impressed me. As for looking dated, these days, usually
that seems to be defined by most people as not looking like a recent
version of Windows, which also isn't something I really aspire to with
my desktop anyway.
I think I'd agree with everything you've said -- if MusE (or any app)
decided to stay on QT3 for longer, it wouldn't break my heart at all!