On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 04:58 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Or the things I have been mastering might have had god EQ balance right
from the start, and little to no EQ was needed.
Rich...
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 12:00 +0000,
linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org wrote:
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:50:52 -0600
From: "Jack O'Quin" <jack.oquin(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LAU] Jamin
To: Ricardus Vincente <wizardofgosz(a)gmail.com>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org>
Message-ID:
<CAB6SgyXwmxgQb2snkufYeCX0dqGfk9iZWUsqymHyjZ66vvwYYg(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Ricardus Vincente
<wizardofgosz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
?Does anyone happen to know what comes first in
Jamin? ?The
multi-band
compressor, or the EQ?
The EQ.
--
?joq
Hi Ricardus :)
if you need to ask, than you probably are using Jamin with strange
settings for the compression.
If your compressor settings are ok, you'll notice if the EQ does or
doesn't effect the compression.
OTOH I noticed that impact of makeup and what is saved and restored for
the EQ settings changed between versions of Jamin.
Regards,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user