25 Mar
2020
25 Mar
'20
10:59 a.m.
Am 25.03.20 um 02:26 schrieb Fernando Lopez-Lezcano:
Weird, in my machine this is what I see (ambdec 0.5.1):
$ jack_lsp|grep ambdec
ambdec:in.0w
ambdec:in.1y
ambdec:in.1z
ambdec:in.1x
ambdec:in.2v
ambdec:in.2t
ambdec:in.2r
ambdec:in.2s
ambdec:in.2u
ambdec:in.3q
ambdec:in.3o
ambdec:in.3m
ambdec:in.3k
ambdec:in.3l
ambdec:in.3n
ambdec:in.3p
ambdec:test
Yeah! That's the table I was looking for!
The "Using Ardour with Ambisonics"-page decodes the "mono panners"
outputs that way:
"Connect Ardour's master out as follows:
* out1 -> ambdec:in0_w
* out2 -> ambdec:in0_x
* out3 -> ambdec:in0_y"
>> As far as I can see, that's OK. Connect your four outputs to the first
>> four inputs of ambdec.
>
> Yeah, I've tried that. Master 1,2,3,4 to ambdec 0,1,2,3 via "catia".
So, if I can believe this data, I have connected "w" correctly, but made
"x" to "y", "y" to "z" and "z" to
"x".
I'm going to check that later…
Many thanks!
And Greets!
Mitsch