26 Jan
2006
26 Jan
'06
3:12 p.m.
Hi Paul, thanks for replying! I'm shaken with the depth of your
knowledge, as always! :)
>Similar to 96 khz. Totally useless.
although i agree about 192, 96 does have one distinct
benefit. the
higher the SR, the easier it is to make a really nice brickwall filter
How very detailed... Thankya!
and once again, please recall that the most of
greatest recordings of
the last 50 years were almost done on technology whose "sound quality"
would generally be laughed at today.
Yeah... yeah, yeah, yeah I'm hanging that one up over my bed.
Carlo