19 Jul
2011
19 Jul
'11
5:24 p.m.
This is one of the reasons I love Linux, knowledgeable supportive people
talking straight to the point.
If I would've asked such a question in the pt forum or something like that,
I would've got a whole bunch of PT hype and not these concrete points you
all made here.
I sure got something to read now.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Charles Henry <czhenry(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Folderol
<folderol(a)ukfsn.org> wrote:
I think you'll find that fundamentally an analogue mixer *is* A+B=C
To the extent that modeling actual analog mixers would be useless.
The amplifiers in analog mixers do have non-flat spectrum (as all
amplifiers have a limited gain-bandwidth product and phase-shift at
high frequencies). However, the equipment is so designed as to have a
nearly constant phase and gain over the range of audio frequencies.
Plus, add noise. Both of which you could do intentionally, instead of
having some software black box that does it without telling you :)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:55:34 -0400
Paul Coccoli <pcoccoli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Dale Powell <dj_kaza(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
> > Agree on the whole that summing is
summing is summing. Most DAWs these
days
> > will use floating point (either 32bit or
double precision) and A+B=C
no
matter what.
Isn't all this "A+B=C" stuff (or A*x+B*y=C as one person stated)
actually begging the question a bit? Are we certain that every DAW
implements their mixer that way? Isn't it possible that some might
try to model analog mixers to some degree?
I'm not arguing either way; I have no clue.