20 Dec
2003
20 Dec
'03
1:32 p.m.
On Saturday 20 December 2003 10:08 am, Thorsten Mika wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:12:13 +0000
tim hall <tech(a)glastonburymusic.org.uk> wrote:
The Jack implementation in ZynAddSubFX is problematic, and is being
worked on. It is known to "zombify" very easily. I love it anyway :)
Do you have this problem frequently with other Jack applications?
|)
|)enji
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 08:49, Thorsten
Mika wrote:
I do not really think they are "low end". But my experience with jack,
fluidsynth and timidity tells me that it reliable low latency is not
possible. Best thing I can achieve is a latency of 92,9ms (as I said,
with Duron 1Ghz and 256MB RAM). Setting the laten cy lower leads to JACK
"throwing out" apps like ZynAddSubFX. as a user of a "low end" machine (duron
1Ghz, 256MB)
So 1G processors are 'low end' now? Heaven help the rest of us!