6 Aug
2012
6 Aug
'12
3:03 a.m.
I agree with your review. The library is such a great effort for the
Open Source community but yeah, especially the sustain of some of the
instruments (or lack thereof) has been a problem for me as well...
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Brett McCoy <idragosani(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Nils
<list(a)nilsgey.de> wrote:
Full version:
http://www.nilsgey.de/2012/08/06/ExperimentOne-ForSonatinaSymphonicOrchestr…
tl;dr:
Wrote a piece, 1:30 length, to test the Sonatine Symphonic Orchestra.
The lib is mediocre and outdated but still the best open source one.
Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJcraiTevSs&feature=player_embedded
Flac:
http://www.nilsgey.de/uploads/Experiment%20One%20-%20For%20Sonatina%20Symph…
This was also a toolchain test:
Laborejo -> jack-smf-player -> Lisao+linuxsampler -> jack_capture.
No audio mixing (EQ, compressor etc.) involved but ir lv2 on the linuxsampler sum.
Those instruments don't sound bad at all, although it seems this
library has some limitations with chromatic notes and velocity layers.
--
Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it,
it would overturn the world."
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user