4 Jan
2005
4 Jan
'05
3:56 a.m.
Shayne O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 12:43, Mark Knecht wrote:
As I responded to Mark's statement, the adjusted wording and sentiment
is this; do as you will with what you will. I aint no ones daddy when
it comes to Linux, windows or otherwise. :)
It is the choice of the individual and I forbid myself to make grandiose
statements in the future because God forbid I should impose an opinion
on someone else. :)
R~
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 19:59:14 -0500 (EST),
hanaghan(a)starband.net
<hanaghan(a)starband.net> wrote:
>This would be good but I have to ponder this point;
>
>The purpose of Linux audio and it's native applications was to create an
>open source alternative, that equals and in many cases exceeds the
>proprietary software world was it not?
>
>
yes, it does seem a bit stupid, but i think we should have a right to use any software we
choose. that means being able to use windows software on linux, or open source software on
windows.
having windows audio apps work on linux will make the transition easier for people
who've only ever used windows. at the same time, i'm not suggesting that our very
talented open-source developers dedicate any time to this, only us users and hackers ...
surely it's a no-lose situation?
i agree with mark - linux is more about choice - which includes the choice to not use
proprietary software.
anyway, i'm sort of happy with what i've got now, so i guess i'll leave it up
to the individual as to whether they could be bothered :)
shayne