21 Dec
2012
21 Dec
'12
4:05 a.m.
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 17:30 -0800, Len Ovens wrote:
On Thu, December 20, 2012 4:56 am, Moshe Werner
wrote:
Without prejudice, there are different levels of "open".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_standard
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offener_Standard
RAVENNA - Operating Principles - Lawo
Draft 1.0. Operating Principles
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=ravenna%20operating%20princip…
Have been reading about this lately.
Anyone knows what the state is regarding Linux audio and Ravenna?
http://ravenna.alcnetworx.com/technology/about-ravenna.html
Would be very interesting as it's open technology standard.
I looked at the web page... it looks rather pie in the sky-ish lots of
"will be" kinds of language. There are holding companies out there looking
for stuff to make money off of. Asking people for ideas that they then
patent and sell. It says open... but part of it will not be. Someone has
an idea, but no idea how to do it. They are hoping someone will do it for
them. Then they will market it and make money. Because it is to be open...
there is no need to pay the developer :)