Re: [LAU] poll : Advertising vs Linux Audio

On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 12:00 +0000, linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org wrote: Hi :) to many hardware companies already add to their advertisings that their hardware is Linux compatible, that they do care a lot for Linux. The truth usually is, that their hardware is able to work with flaw and even that just with some releases of some Linux distros. Should such companies get support by the community? For good reasons advertisings anyway might be not allowed: "hosting: our current host vt.edu does not allow advertising" - Robin IMO that's good! Regards, Ralf -- At the moment I can't read that thread completely, since the discussion seems to be very long. OT: Pardon, I didn't read and answered private mails for more than a month. I'll do it ASAP. Besides, I compared AVlinux 5.0.3, Kernel 3.0.23-avl-7-pae threadirqs with Kernel 3.0.23-rt40, also PAE, but optimized to AMD, for work with internal MIDI, using it's default JACK1 and a RME HDSPe AIO. FWIW since editing nv-linux.h didn't help, I used the FLOSS nv driver. I run JACK1 with -Z and sample_rate=48000, frames_period=256. Clients still get lost and there are tons of audible glitches, that are shown as xruns, so serious audio work is impossible, the only good news is, that there's no difference between the default threadirqs kernel and the kernel-rt. Someday I'll report about the result, when using different versions of JACK.